Clicky

May 19, 2013

Breaking: House Leaders Express Concern that Nearly $10 Billion in Health IT Spending May Have Been Wasted

Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI), Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI), Ways and Means Health Subcommittee Chairman Wally Herger (R-CA), and Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee Chairman Joe Pitts (R-PA) called on Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to immediately suspend the distribution of incentive payments related to the Electronic Health Records (EHR) program.  The top House policymakers on healthcare are concerned that HHS is squandering taxpayer dollars by asking little of providers in return for incentive payments.  Recent reports revealed that the EHR program may be leading to higher Medicare spending and greater inefficiencies while doing little, if anything, to improve health outcomes.

The members urged Secretary Sebelius to halt the incentive payments and delay penalties for providers who choose not to integrate Health Information Technology (HIT) into their practice until the agency increases what is expected of Meaningful Users and has a clear plan and expectation for interoperability.  A recent survey of clinicians concluded that more work must be done to improve electronic HIT standards with more than 70 percent of respondents reporting “a lack of interoperability” as a major barrier that impairs them from sharing information in an electronic setting.

Outlining their concerns, the members wrote, “It is critical that your agency do everything possible to advance interoperability and meaningful use of HIT, not just in name only….More than four and a half years and two final Meaningful Use rules later, it is safe to say that we are no closer to interoperability in spite of the nearly $10 billion spent.  With the bar for Meaningful Use set so low and with a focus instead on trying to pad participation rates, these challenges are predictable.  Incentive payments, particularly those funded by the Medicare trust funds and taxpayers, should be given to providers who are truly ‘meaningful users’ of EHR.”

To view the complete letter, click here.

via waysandmeans.house.gov

  • http://twitter.com/mauricerosenbau Maurice Rosenbaum

    Give me a break! How uninformed from the practice/provider point of view are these people? Do they have any idea what hoops practices jump through now to meet Stage 1 or have they read Stage 2 at all? Sorry but true.

  • http://twitter.com/mauricerosenbau Maurice Rosenbaum

    Give me a break here. Are these folks that out of touch with the hoops of a small medical practice goes through to meet MU Stage 1? Have they really read and understand what is in MU Stage 2 at this point? I think not.

  • John Macikowski

    The interoperability of EHR Systems and MU use incentives for Practice and Hospital Adoption are completely different issues. A practice using an EHR system properly (again, the keyword here is properly, both properly trained and properly using the system) IS positively impacting the medical care of their patients.

    This is not just a free money tree for providers. In fact most EHRs require a significant investment of time and money, and ALL EHRs, used correctly, will impose a significant time penalty on the documenting providers using it. Mitigating that time penalty costs providers even more more money, and can only be accomplished by using a Dictation service, a Medical Scribe or using specific EHR workflow capabilities in Dragon Medical (for more on that you can go to SpeechDrivenEMR.com). MU stage two is also far from meaningless, and it will have a significant impact on the entire medical community over time.
    I would prefer that lawmakers spend their time crafting a new bi-partisan healthcare bill that actually has something to do with healthcare, and not just insurance eligibility. The only truly viable method of lowering healthcare costs long term (without penalizing providers or patients) is to implement tort reform and have us all work together and focus on educating patients at a very young age on how to mitigate the onset of those preventable diseases and conditions that are primarily due to personal choices (IE proper nutrition, obesity, lack of exercise and smoking.) We are all of a sudden worried about 20 Billion dollars to the entire Healthcare industry? (Money, that is in fact, changing the face of healthcare for the better, despite the inherent challenges.)
    Does congress really want to open meaningful dialogue with constituents on how much money they have wasted on projects that have had zero return? Somehow, I don’t think so…
    Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater, and instead work to make a good thing even better. Let’s put in place legitimate and functional interoperability standards that EHRs need to meet in order to be considered for MU payments, and not penalize the providers that are working as hard as they can with the tools they are provided with.

  • Ben Harrison

    To say that the money was wasted is
    not the truth. The providers are jumping through hopes trying to get it done
    and the vendors are changing systems like mad. Expecting a large hospital
    or single practice physicians’ offices to change overnight is short sighted. The process is extreme – The new equipment required, the new software,
    the changing of the offices process, the process of re-education for the
    employees. This is all expensive and the Meaningful use payments help pay for
    it. In addition the interoperability is
    there but still complex, but it can be done, without the payments offices might
    be going under or doing nothing at all!

  • http://www.emrdailynews.com Steve Campbell

    Agreed – the appears to be a totally partisan play by a group of our elected representatives – shockingly all from the same party, to garner some news during what Farzad Mostashari called the “politcal silly season”.

  • http://www.emrdailynews.com Steve Campbell

    Thanks for your thoughtful response. The idea of bi-partisan anything right now seems to be a bit out of reach but we can all be hopeful.

  • http://stephenrcampbell.com Steve Campbell

    It’s much easier to stand up on Capital Hill and make broad pronouncements on things you don’t fully understand than it is to take the time to actually understand the process. Disruption takes time and is uncomfortable but the light is there at the end of the tunnel and we can begin to see it.

  • Ben Harrison

    Interoperability has been around a
    long time, however it was not called that. The HL7 records where put together
    in the late 1980’s. But no one has
    pushed the issue until now. So Health
    Records can be transferred – the mechanism
    is there, however in an industry where hardware, internet, software and devices
    are changing so rapidly it is hard to keep up. The industry has made great strides and we
    help physicians pass patient information between practices all the time.

  • Harry Selent

    This is not what is needed at this moment in time as the monies were already committed to doctors and many have purchased based on the incentive monies in the future.

  • http://stephenrcampbell.com Steve Campbell

    Sadly I think they may just be that out of touch. Political posturing requires very little critical thought.

  • http://stephenrcampbell.com Steve Campbell

    It seems highly unlikely to me that this is anything more than political posturing. You’re right – they monies were committed to the physicians and deciding to make this kind of switch to me in the middle of the process seems silly.

  • http://stephenrcampbell.com Steve Campbell

    Looking beyond the request to stop paying the money the request for improved interoperability, through whatever means, seems valid to me. You’re obviously right about HL7 but if vendors do need to find a way that these systems can share information, whether it be HL7 or something else.

  • http://twitter.com/cnelson16 Chris Nelson

    Released the day after the debate…another example of the machine in action.

  • http://www.facebook.com/glenn.smith.31508 Glenn Smith

    How can you get to interoperability without first getting providers to transition from paper to electronic records? The 3 stages of the meaningful use incentive program ensure that providers don’t just implement an EHR, jump through some hoops and then recieve incentive money. There is a progression to get to interoperability over time and the incentive payments are paid over time as well.